View Full Forums : Survival of the Fittest vs Crescentbloom
01-06-2009, 04:55 AM
I solo most of the time, so I don't exactly know what the difference with these two spells are. If I already have Crescentbloom Rk II, should I spend 2k for SotF Rk II? Could someone explain this to me?
Thanks in advance!
01-06-2009, 08:34 AM
Crescentbloom rk2 is a 4.5 sec cast regular group heal with a base heal of 4149 hp
Soft rk2 is a 1 sec cast emergency group heal - game description is:
<TABLE class=spellview cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle><TABLE class=spellview width="95%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=spelldata width="80%">Gives your companions the will to survive despite overwhelming odds, rescuing group members that are in danger of death with a large heal. The lower the health of your companions, the more they will benefit from the heal.
Level 83 upgrade:
01-06-2009, 07:32 PM
SoTF is great during raids. The fast cast time allows you to remain focused...not that us druids lose focus ever...honest. I have used SoTF mainly during raids where I am main healer in the rogue or wizard groups and think it is an awesome spell. I am waiting for lvl 83 to see if the upgrade is just as good.
01-07-2009, 03:13 AM
Survival is expensive as all hell, but so very worth it.
01-09-2009, 06:42 AM
thsi spell rocks use it on line with group heals and 90% of the time ya never will have a death in yoru group on raids just got to get the timign down for ya get max benafit of it i use it when a player in my group is 25% HP and lower its fast heal so it will save them allmost all th time.
works good on grous alls o if yoru main healer and its gettign crazzy.
vBulletin v3.0.0, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.