Page 2 of 2

Re: You Feminists still think like this?

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:28 pm
by Fyyr
I don't think that 2 millennia of culture can remove 200 millennia of selective breeding.

Like Tudamorf said, female selection and reproductive behaviors are encouraged culturally, and male reproductive strategies and behaviors are vilified culturally. There is bound to be conflict.

I watch porn. It satisfies one of the male instincts that I have. I did not learn it, I am able to have sex with hundreds of attractive different women, by proxy. But because I watch porn, and Farley says most men do, that I am a potential rapist. Essentially stating that merely because I am a man, I should be viewed as a real threat.

Re: You Feminists still think like this?

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:19 am
by Tudamorf
erianaiel wrote:But, to encourage your preconceived notions: Because after 2 millenia and more of women being under permanent death threat for daring to act like a human being maybe it is clear that men's instincts -are- vile?
What about the 150,000 years before that? Or the regions outside of Europe?

Your 2000 years in Europe is an anomaly, due to newly discovered technology (agriculture) that temporarily messed up the natural balance set by instincts.

The fact is, men have the instincts they have because your female ancestors selected for them. And you continue to select them to this very day, choosing wealthy, powerful, confident, and tall men over poor, abject, meek, and short ones.

If men are vile for having their instincts, then women are even more vile for actively creating, and perpetuating, the situation.

Besides now, for Europeans, the imbalance has shifted once again in your favor, so what exactly are you complaining about?

Re: You Feminists still think like this?

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:07 am
by Fyyr
Zute wrote:Some men prefer looks over brains. They don't care if their wife can hold up her end of an intellectual conversation. Perhaps some women prefer brains over looks, so they marry well-educated men.

Regarding the children of intelligent men and attractive women.

In your experience, your observation, are those children generally smarter or dumber than their mothers?
Are they more attractive than their fathers, or not?

Generally speaking, of course.

Rumor Willis is not as attractive as her mother, I think we can all agree on that. But she is far better looking than her father.
Or Isabella Rosselini, her father is butt ugly, we can agree on that; is she more or less attractive(at the same respective ages) as her mother?
Kate Hudson's father was just as ugly as Isabella's father. Would you agree that she is more attractive and more intelligent than her mother?