http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_957945.html?menu=

*no reply*

I don't buy it. I don't care how sheltered a guy is, he had to have atleast seen animals do it and I'm sure he discovered his own..umm....functions :rolleyes: by the time he was 36.

Why religion is stupid... reason number 627 :D

Uhh.. wow.. Hmm, what Seriena said. Lol, that's like agreeing with myself. (almost how you spell my name.) :p

Another example of modern medicine interfering with the process of natural selection.....:)

LOL! Scirocco wins the "hits the nail squarely" award on that one.

A_German_Woman says "Husbands like you have destroyed your own lands you will not invade mine!"

A_German_Woman scowles ready to attack.

Odd, considering in the middle ages the churches - at least in Europe - had images of people copulating on the outside of the church, and they were told to 'go at it' as much as possible. Ya know, the go forth and multiply phrase.

In my case I only had to watch 2563 **** movies to finally find out what it was all about ;)

BTW, didn't the woman ever, ehm, itch? :o

I personally don't believe it. Hell, who hasn't seen that online vid of the baby 'humping' a doll in his crib? It's instinctual.

I must admit, I haven't seen any videos of babies humping dolls... it's not the sort of thing I search for ;)

http://www.snopes.com/pregnant/nosex.asp

It may or may not be a hoax, but it's still a funny story.

LOL! Its getting to the point where I consider just about everything an urban myth until proved otherwise.

Snopes use The Mirror as the source of the story (no idea where Ananova got it from?)... well that's a British paper and what we call a 'tabloid'. That term contains a lot more meaning than just the paper size - 'the tabloids' are historically known for overblown, dramatic, ridiculous, unbacked stories usually at the expense and/or ridicule of others. The stories usually turn out to be fiction, often with added humour.

As a sidenote, They're also associated with the paparrazi that hound any people in public interest to the extremes of privacy breeches. The same sort that went charging in to take photographs of Princess Diana dying.

If they are indeed the main source then it's unlikely to be true...

This is the the same paper that published the fake Iraq torture photos btw.

Sorry, I know it's good hearted humour but you can tell I dislike the tabloids :)