Re: Should mankind survive?
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 4:25 pm
An online gaming community
https://thedruidsgrove.org/forums/
Which requires an input of energy.Fyyr wrote:Carbon dioxide and water is not useful?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis
Because the energy required to extract and refine it is less than the energy produced by the final product.Fyyr wrote:How is gasoline under the ground useful?
No more than the space shuttle defies gravity.Fyyr wrote:If hydrogen molecules are just leaving the Earth, and flying off out into space, that just defies the Law of Gravity.
We're not immune, we're resistant. Given how widespread cannibalism was in human groups worldwide, it might have been an evolutionary advantage over the other species that couldn't rely on that food source.Fyyr wrote:I dont understand your point here. If it's that we will evolve into Moorlocks and Eloi, that's a possibility I suppose. If your saying we already are(or were) the Moorlocks with immunity from prion disease, that's doubtful.There were two to four (and possibly even more) human species living 30,000-50,000 years ago. Suppose only one evolved the ability to eat their own species or related species in relative safety, while the others had the choice of starving or dying to prion disease. It only takes a slight evolutionary advantage for one species to dominate.
Are you trying to make my point for me?Fyyr wrote:Kuru
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuru_(disease)
Immunity
Simon Mead of University College London, and others, showed in their genetic and clinical assessment that people who survived the epidemic in Papua New Guinea were carriers of a prion-resistant factor. Mead's group has shown the source of immunity to be the inheritance of a genetic variant of prion protein G127V.[14][15] This work remains breaking news as of November 22, 2009, and further implications of the discovery including evidence for rapid natural selection of populations are being discussed.[16]
The Sun. Like I said, it's not going anywhere soon.Tudamorf wrote: Which requires an input of energy.
We can use sugars for energy just as we use petrochemicals. I still don't know why leaving gasoline in the ground is useful, or how it is useful. It only becomes useful when we bring it up and use it. I think ultimately you are saying that we should leave it in the ground for future generations to use; if that is true, I fail to see the reason to do that. Honestly, I don't really like most people who are alive, I certainly am not going to sacrifice for people who are not even born yet. Screw them, they have to figure out their own energy problems(when they become alive).Because the energy required to extract and refine it is less than the energy produced by the final product.
Ok, fair enough. Hydrogen is leaving the Earth because it's used as fuel for rockets. That makes sense.No more than the space shuttle defies gravity.
No, not really.Tudamorf wrote:Are you trying to make my point for me?
Given?Tudamorf wrote: Given how widespread cannibalism was in human groups worldwide, it might have been an evolutionary advantage over the other species that couldn't rely on that food source.
It's also not increasing any time soon, and it takes energy and resources to harness it.Fyyr wrote:The Sun. Like I said, it's not going anywhere soon.
Leaving it in the ground is useful because it does less harm there. But that's besides the point that it will be gone soon.Fyyr wrote:I still don't know why leaving gasoline in the ground is useful, or how it is useful. It only becomes useful when we bring it up and use it. I think ultimately you are saying that we should leave it in the ground for future generations to use;
No, that's not what I meant. Hydrogen can reach escape velocity on its own. Look up Jeans escape.Fyyr wrote:Ok, fair enough. Hydrogen is leaving the Earth because it's used as fuel for rockets. That makes sense.
http://www.assemblage.group.shef.ac.uk/issue9/cole.htmlFyyr wrote:Given?
You have to give details of this. I don't know how widespread or contained prehistoric cannibalism was.
Are chimpanzees extinct?Fyyr wrote:A species which converts itself to cannibalism when other food sources are available would lead to extinction.
It doesn't have to increase. Not for me.Tudamorf wrote:It's also not increasing any time soon, and it takes energy and resources to harness it.
You say that carbon dioxide and water is harmful. I know that it is necessary for life. We have a difference of opinion.Leaving it in the ground is useful because it does less harm there. But that's besides the point that it will be gone soon.
How?No, that's not what I meant. Hydrogen can reach escape velocity on its own.